Professionalism The Roles of the Professional Nurse - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 980 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2019/04/12 Category Career Essay Level High school Tags: Professionalism Essay Did you like this example? Consider the following scenario: Its a hectic day in the Emergency Room (ER) and the nurses are short-staffed. A patient with a history of drug seeking is omitted to the ER and demands a narcotic to ease his back pain. The nurse who is taking care of him is irritated and yells at the patient stating, youre nothing but a drug addict! The nurse administers the drug but continues to be rude and condescending. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Professionalism: The Roles of the Professional Nurse" essay for you Create order When the nurse gets off her shift, she feels she needs to vent about her day and calls a fellow co-worker. Although the nurse names no names, she makes it obvious who the patient is. She continues to vent about how the majority of society drug seeks and believes that people who ask for a narcotic arent really in pain. The next day, the nurses supervisor calls and fires the nurse for unprofessional conduct towards a patient and for discussing private patient information to a fellow co-worker. The nurse doesnt hold herself accountable, believing she was harmless when yelling at the patient, because she still gave the pain medication anyway. She then calls the coworker and blames them for getting her fired. Obviously, this nurse had no training and a lack of education in professional boundaries. This scenario is a general example that could affect any nurse that breaches his or her professional boundaries, because there will be situations where nurses may be understaffed, a patient may be drug-seeking, and where a nurse wants to vent about their day. However, it is how the nurse conducts his or her self that is critical to maintaining professionalism and accountability in coping with such situations. According to the American Nurses Association, professionalism is defined as accountability that is rooted to an ethical and moral principle. This adheres to a nurse taking responsibility, as well as, respecting self-determination of the patient (Black, 2015). Thus, to reserve p rofessionalism, what the nurse should have done was communicate with the supervisor from the start that the unit was understaffed, as well as, build a rapport with the patient, specifically in relations to the patients pain. Also, she should have maintained self-awareness to allow for unbiased attitudes, especially in regard to discussing private information to a fellow co-worker, which should have been avoided. By following the first step in communication, the nurse could have prevented the aftermath from the beginning. I believe being a good communicator is critical when it comes to any tension in the workplace, especially in the healthcare environment because it motivates staff and builds a team working experience. Furthermore, professional boundaries set the tone between the nurse and patient communication. For example, in the scenario, the nurse over-stepped her professional boundaries by yelling at the patient due to an under-involvement in patient care, biases, and neglected patient communication. Conversing with the patient is an integral part of the nurse-patient relationship and is acknowledged as a therapeutic process that can alleviate vulnerabilities of the patient (Black, 2015). Therefore, if such a situation were to arise, I would first converse with staff, avoid stereotypical ideas, and build rapport centered around the patient, so that he or she could feel less vulnerable. Pain is subjective and ineffective pain management happens more often than not, especially for those patients who have debilitating diseases with a high tolerance to pain. Every individual experience pain and some more than others can be highly sensitive to its effects on the body. I understand that this can be a challenge in the clinical setting when assessing pain, but by focusing on individual differences, pain magnitude can be backed up by the patients health history. Incidentally, communication is key, thus inter-personal relationships with fellow colleagues involved in the patients care can support a better accurate assessment for a patients pain. This includes having the patient involved in treatment options and having the health care professionals do a continuous follow-up to be tter manage pain in the future (Glowacki, 2015); thus, these effective pain strategies can improve patient outcome and satisfaction in pain relief. When a nurse is self-aware, the nurse is able to recognize their own emotions, beliefs, and biases and how they are discerned by others (Black, 2017). I have confidence that self-awareness is one of the most important things that a nurse can attain through their profession. This type of realization comes with practice and can be mastered over time, but if it is not considered, it can be a loss of professionalism when dealing with the care of patients. This can relate to basic patient care, as well as, keeping information about that patient private. As a nursing student, it can be difficult in realizing my personal challenges that I may have as a nurse, but by starting early on basic reflective practices, I believe Ill overcome any obstacles that relate to patient care and privacy. More importantly, it is critical to avoid stereotyping and to attain non-judgmental acceptance as a nurse. In the scenario, the nurse lacked this which became her overall downfall. According to the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (2018), the nurse must examine when they feel that they are crossing a boundary with the patient, they must consider the potential implications and avoid any violations in the future. Again, knowing ones own beliefs and realizing any potential outcomes if professionalism isnt followed through, is of most importance. Overall, if situations arise where professional boundaries are tested, I consider values such as positive communication with fellow team members to be the first go-to in a problematic situation. More i mportantly, building a good rapport with ones patients is obligatory for any health care worker, because this is the groundwork for building trust with the patient, as well as, making sense of their chief complaint. Lastly, maintaining a self-awareness is imperative and I regard it as the answer to being unbiased and non-judgmental in respects to all people.

Pleading Insanity Mental Illness - 2901 Words

Julie Wanzer Dr. King 18 September 2014 English 1102 Pleading Insanity Too many times in today’s society people don’t consider mental illness to be anything other than, voices in one’s head, or being a suicidal maniac. But actually it goes a lot farther than that. People who have a mental illness have gotten worse over the past 20 years, not that the illness has gotten any worse, because it hasn’t, but what it has pushed people to do has been drastically different. One common thing that is very controversial in America today is if someone has murdered, and they have a mental illness, should their punishment be the same as anyone else, or they be acquitted because of their illness. Everyone certainly believes that murder is absolutely wrong not matter how it’s looked at, but where is the line drawn, that makes one have a mental illness and one just being absolutely cruel. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary a mental disability is referred to as â€Å"A mental or bodily condition marked primari ly by sufficient disorganization of personality, mind, and emotions to seriously impair the normal psychological functioning of the individual.† When one has a mental disability, they aren’t themselves. Therefore they don’t make decisions themselves. Once someone has murdered and they go to court they have three options, when they are pleading. They have guilty, not guilty, and not guilty with reason of insanity. First, the history of the insanity defense, according to Mark NolanShow MoreRelatedInsanity Defense Essay1469 Words   |  6 Pages Insanity is defined as a mental disorder of such severity as to render its victim incapable of managing his affairs or conforming to social standards. (Insanity, pg. 1) It is used in court to state that the defendant was not aware of what he/she was doing at the time of the crime, due to mental illnesses. But insanity is a legal, not a medical, definition. There is a difference between mental illness and going insa ne. Many problems are raised by the existence of the insanity defenseRead MoreThe Insanity Plea For Pleading Insane1616 Words   |  7 PagesOver the years the abuse of insanity plea, has troubled our American Justice System in our world today. The growth in this defense has increased so much that the expansion has asked the question; whether or not insanity plea is a worthy and justified defense to be used in the courts. The Insanity defense is when a criminal defendant can be found to have been legally insane when that defendant committed the crime they did at the time. In some cases, the criminal defendant pleads insane and gets aRead MoreThe Case Of John Wayne Gacy1254 Words   |  6 PagesEach year defendants claim to be mentally insane so they may receive medical treatment for their illness instead of serving jail or prison time. It is my belief that all mentally ill citizens should have the right to be medically treated. Although, not all of these people should be allowed back into society after they have reached their sanity. Some extreme cases such as the case of John Wayne Gacy who was proven insane should still never be let back onto the public streets. John Wayne Gacy murderedRead MoreThe Criminal Justice System: Different Types of Criminal Defense647 Words   |  3 Pagesstarting with: insanity, automatism, duress, self defense, intoxication, necessity/ lesser harm, and mistake of fact. The first criminal defense is pleading insanity which is an affirmative defense. Insanity is a â€Å"legal term rather than a medical one, and indicates a condition that renders the affected person incapable of rational thought, thereby removing criminal culpability† (Pollock, 2013). This means that a defendant is not responsible for their actions due to having mental health issues.Read MoreThe Argument Of The Insanity Defense1429 Words   |  6 PagesThe insanity defense has been a controversial issue among many individuals and legal experts. Whether or not an individual s current mental state can get in the way of their ability to differentiate right from wrong at the time of a committed crime has been a discussion of great debate among society. Although it is rarely used in criminal proceedings its credibility is still questioned by many people. People who believe that the insanity defense should be abolished argue that the individual committedRead MoreThe Psychological P erception Of Aaron And Mentally864 Words   |  4 Pagesmultiple personality disorder or dissociative identity disorder (â€Å"MPD/DID†), which proves Aaron’s whole argument. MPD/DID â€Å"is an illness that is characterized by the presence of at least two clear personality states, called alters, which may have different reactions, emotions, and body functioning† than can lead to â€Å"time and memory lapses and blackouts† . This illness is â€Å"is thought to be an effect of severe trauma during early childhood, usually extreme, repetitive physical, sexual, or emotionalRead MoreNot Guilty by Reason of Insanity1673 Words   |  7 PagesGuilty By Reason of Insanity? Lori Sheets The insanity defense is a defense by excuse. The defendant argues that they should not be held criminally responsible for breaking the law because they were mentally ill or mentally incompetent at the time of their alleged criminal action. The thought behind this is that someone suffering from a mental disorder is not capable of knowing or choosing right from wrong so they should not be punished. When this is the case, they are pleading not guilty by reasonRead MoreA Suitable Punishment And Razor Fruitcake. Insanity, By1605 Words   |  7 PagesFruitcake Insanity, by its dictionary definition, is the derangement of the mind. (Dictionary.com) It is used in everyday contexts, when people say â€Å"You are insane for doing that trick on your dirt bike † or â€Å" The traffic getting out of the game was insane last night!†. However the real definition, written by Cornell University Law School states that â€Å"A person accused of a crime can acknowledge that they committed the crime, but argue that they are not responsible for it because of their mental illnessRead MoreThe Court Of The Insanity Defense1451 Words   |  6 Pagesstandard for the insanity defense arose in the British courts in 1834 when a woodturner named Daniel M’Naghten shot and killed the secretary of England’s Prime Minister. The insanity defense is a difficult, but occasionally successful defense system in a court of law. The law varies from state to state however, the idea remains the same. The defense allows a small number of defendants to get out of a crime if they are deemed legally insane. Only being approximately 180 years old, the insanity defense allowsRead MoreThe Insanity Plea Is A Common Thing1144 Words   |  5 PagesThe insanity plea is a very rare but very often used plea in court. Many people try to get away with their crimes by pleading not guilty for reason of insanity but very rarely do people get by with it. There have been many tests and rules made since the insanity plea became a common thing. With every test, people would find loop holes and way through the system. The test we currently use is very specific and very hard to pass by and that is why so many people cannot plead guilty for reason of

Law and the Legal Consequences Polly and Grace

Question: Discuss about the Law and the Legal Consequences Polly and Grace. Answer: Issue Whether Frank committed trespass on Graces land Whether Polly is personally liable to get her sheep back from Frank Law The term trespass refers to a direct, wrongful negligent or intentional interference with the interest of another person or the persons integrity. The interests of the person include the possession or ownership of goods or lands. Intentional torts may be committed against the personal property of any person. Personal property refers to any moveable property including goods or chattels[1]. The following are the three kinds of individual torts that include trespass to personal property: Conversion- it is applicable when the goods have been completely destroyed; Trespass to goods or chattels- it is applicable when the interference with the goods did not cause damage to the goods; Detinue- it refers to the wrongful detention of the goods; The trespass to goods takes place when the defendant intentionally and directly interferes with the goods that are in the possession of the plaintiff at the time of committing such interference as was held in Penfolds Wines Pty Ltd v Elliot [1946] 74 CLR 204. The person who is in the actual possession of the goods at the time of the interference shall be entitled to bring a legal action against the wrongdoer[2]. As mentioned earlier that detinue is the detention of the goods in a wrongful manner. A legal action against detinue shall lie if the goods are wrongfully detained and a demand for returning the goods has been made. Therefore, the prerequisites for bringing an action on the grounds of detinue are wrongful detention of goods; demand for such goods and a refusal to return the detained goods[3]. Detention of goods In case goods are wrongfully detained, the defendant must possess the goods for some time; however, the goods need not be in the possession of the defendant at the time when the demand for returning the goods is made[4]. Moreover, besides possessing another persons goods without the permission of such person, the defendant must have an intention to keep the goods against the rights of the owner of such goods. Demand and Refusal In Egan v State Transport Authority [1982] 31 SASR 481, it was held that the demand for the return of the goods need not be in writing, an oral demand is sufficient and valid, however, the demand must be unequivocal and it must clearly provide instructions to return the goods. The refusal of the defendant must be unreasonable and unequivocal. A defendant shall also be held liable in detinue in the event of an unintentional or innocent loss of such detained goods as was observed in John F Goulding Pty Ltd v Victorian Railway Commissioners [1932] 48 CLR 157. The defendant may exempt his liabilities if it is established that the detention was unintentional or adequate care has been taken care of such goods. Further, the defendant may after receiving such demand for returning the goods, request time for confirming the authenticity of the rights of the claimant[5]. The intentional interferences with land are also actionable under the torts law. In Plenty v Dillon [1991] 171 CLR 635 it was held that trespass to land takes place when there is an intentional and direct interference with the real property of any person without permission or consent, where such property is in exclusive possession of the person. In order to bring a legal action against trespass to land the plaintiff must establish the following requisites: Possession- it is imperative that the land is in exclusive possession of the plaintiff, which implies that the plaintiff has a contractual right to occupy the land and has the right to exclude others from the possession of the land. Land (subject matter) the tort of action is concerned with the direct interference with the land. Land includes factory, house or any equipment that is permanently attached to the crops, land and airspace. Direct Interference- in order to establish tort of trespass to land, there must be a direct interference of the defendant. A person may commit trespass against the land of a person in the following five ways. Where there is no authority to enter at all, a person may commit trespass by entering into the premises. Erection of any building may be treated as an unlawful entry to the land where such erection amounts to trespass. Where an authority to enter exists but such entrance is restricted to specific purpose and entry for other purpose shall amount to trespass. Where a person has entered under license but such person refuses to leave after the expiry of the license. If a person enters into a land and thrusts any objects onto the land without authorization or lawful consent, shall commit a trespass to land. If a person enters onto a land with the consent of the person in possession of the land does not amounts to trespass. Consent may be express, implied, or authorized by law. Express permission exists when a person in possession of land permits another person to enter into the land for a specified purpose[6]. If the license enters into the land for a different purpose other than the purpose permitted by the plaintiff, the licensee shall be held liable for committing trespass as was held in Barker v R [1983] 153 CLR 338. Application In the given scenario, Polly asks Grace to look after her sheep for two months and allow them to graze in the far back paddock. Grace instead, moved them with her with other petting zoo animals. Franks bespoke-bred sheep were stolen a year ago. When Ethan showed him the pictures of the sheep in Graces petting zoo, he was shocked to see that the sheep looked identical to his missing bespoke-bred sheep. He was convinced that they were his missing flock and entered into Graces land and stole all the 10 sheep from the petting zoo. Here, Frank entered into Graces land without her permission with the intention to steal the sheep from her petting zoo. His conduct amounts to trespass to land as well as detinue. Detinue is the wrongful detention of goods of other person who has exclusive possession over the goods. In order to bring an action on the grounds of detinue, the plaintiff must establish that the requisites of detinue have been fulfilled. The requisites of detinue are wrongful detention of goods; demand for such goods and a refusal to return the detained goods as was held in Egan v State Transport Authority [1982]. In the given case, Frank has wrongfully detained the flock that was in the actual possession of Polly without her consent or any lawful authorization. Polly demanded Frank to return her flock within 7 days otherwise; she would bring a legal action against him. Frank refused to return the sheep on the ground that he is waiting to confirm the ownership of the flock from Biosecurity Queensland. However, the defendant may exempt his liabilities if it is established that the detention was unintentional or adequate care has been taken care of such goods. Further, the defendant may after receiving such demand for returning the goods, request time for confirming the authenticity of the rights of the claimant[7]. Here, Frank may use the defense that he has taken adequate care of the sheep. Regarding the refusal for returning the sheep to Polly, he may exempt his liabilities on the ground that he was waiting for the confirmation of the ownership of the flock until then he cannot return them. Further, in this case, with respect to Ethans liability for committing trespass on Graces land, Grace has permitted the public with a free entry to enjoy her petting zoo and the grounds of her property on the condition that smoking, alcohol and photography on her land was strictly prohibited. However, Ethan was caught drinking whisky and taking photos by the eco pond. Grace had caught Ethan and asked him to leave many times before on the ground of drinking and clicking photos. In this case, Ethans conduct amounts to trespass to land because when a person enters onto the land of another person who is in an exclusive possession of the land, without any lawful authority or consent of such person, the person entering is said to have committed trespass to land. Grace was in exclusive possession of the land and has given express consent to public to visit her petting zoo and garden, situated on her land with the condition that smoking, alcohol and photography is prohibited. However, when the licensee is allowed to enter the land of another person for specific purpose but he enters for another purpose, the person so entering is liable for committing trespass to land. However, Grace can revoke her permission at any time she wants and prohibit Frank from entering onto her land instead of merely relying on her intention to exclude him from her land. Frank may use the defense of contributory negligence stating that Grace has caught him many times but never stopped hi m from entering the premises. Conclusion Ethan has committed trespass to land and the Polly may recover her flock after the confirmation of the ownership of the flock. However, Grace may be entitled to compensatory damages for the loss of her earning capacity and Grace may be entitled to nominal damages for infringement of her rights to her land. References Barker v R [1983] 153 CLR 338 Beever, Allan.A Theory of Tort Liability. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016. Bermingham, Vera, and Carol Brennan.Tortlaw directions. Oxford University Press, 2016. Ciocchetti, Corey. "7 Things You Need to Know About: Torts (Lecture Slides)." (2015). Egan v State Transport Authority [1982] 31 SASR 481 John F Goulding Pty Ltd v Victorian Railway Commissioners [1932] 48 CLR 157. Li, Xiang, and Jigang Jin. "Tortious Act and Tort Liability."Concise Chinese Tort Laws. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. 11-21. Mullins, Gerard, and Susan Griffiths. "Intentional torts and the civil liability legislation."Precedent (Sydney, NSW)130 (2015): 15. Penfolds Wines Pty Ltd v Elliot [1946] 74 CLR 204 Plenty v Dillon [1991] 171 CLR 635 Steele, J., and Tort Law. "Text, Cases and Materials." (2014). Stickley, Amanda. "The importance of intention."Australian Civil Liability13.7 (2016): 104-106. Stickley, Amanda. "The importance of intention."Australian Civil Liability13.7 (2016): 104-106. Ciocchetti, Corey. "7 Things You Need to Know About: Torts (Lecture Slides)." (2015). Bermingham, Vera, and Carol Brennan.Tortlaw directions. Oxford University Press, 2016. Mullins, Gerard, and Susan Griffiths. "Intentional torts and the civil liability legislation."Precedent (Sydney, NSW)130 (2015): 15. Beever, Allan.A Theory of Tort Liability. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016. Li, Xiang, and Jigang Jin. "Tortious Act and Tort Liability."Concise Chinese Tort Laws. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. 11-21. Steele, J., and Tort Law. "Text, Cases and Materials." (2014).

Racial Prejudice in the Movie Crash Essay Example

Racial Prejudice in the Movie Crash Essay The collision between race, power, and greed doesn’t begin to explain the dynamic Paul Haggis directs with the 2004 Academy Award winning film Crash.The dynamic of serving as a law enforcement agent and being a white male is a double edged sword. On one end, the individual is responsible for protecting and serving those in their area. The other end is being historically in control of everything and privileged. This combination can lead some to perform unjust actions and Officer John Ryan is not an exception.Officer Ryan’s prejudice toward other ethnic groups, leads him to assume that people usually act according to their ethnic group. Eventually, Officer Ryan comes to the realization that it is morally correct to treat people as individuals, not races. The introduction of Officer Ryan, shows he doesn’t think â€Å"Shaniqua,† who he assumes is an African American, deserves to be manager. He assumes since she is black she earned her job not from merit but rather from affirmative action. In later scenes, Ryan attempts to sympathize with Shaniqua, in person, to convince her how desperate he is for his father’s medication, but eventually is denied again. At this point, Officer Ryan begins to belittle her, stating the only reason she is sitting in that seat is that of her race and affirmative action that many other white people are far more qualified than she is. Officer Ryan even explains how his father suffered from affirmative action and was put out of business, when he never discriminated and would hire any hard worker. Afterward, Shaniqua said she would have considered Ryan’s request if his father had been present but again, she denies him. Ryan leaves frustrated and denies the possibility that a black w oman is capable of earning a supervisor position. Though it is unclear how Shaniqua earned her position, no one has the authority to degrade a person because of their race and ethnicity. We will write a custom essay sample on Racial Prejudice in the Movie Crash specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Racial Prejudice in the Movie Crash specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Racial Prejudice in the Movie Crash specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Later in the movie, Officer Ryan, an